SIMULATION
LEAGUE
The ultimate proving and learning ground for Builders, Founders, and Operators. Score points. Climb the ranks. Can you stay at the top across 50 intense Matchdays?
Meta Vr Pivot 2021
The global leaderboard is open. Lock in your score before the 7-day window closes.
Play NowMcp Build Or Skip 2026
The global leaderboard is open. Lock in your score before the 7-day window closes.
Play NowNewsletter
Join the Roster.
Enter your email to get drafted when Matchday 26 goes live.
Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.
League Rules & Mechanics
The Matchday
A high-stakes drill drops every Wednesday and Sunday. You have until the next drop to lock in your score.
One Shot Only
No do-overs in a crisis. You must log in. Only your absolute first attempt counts for leaderboard points.
The Standings
It's all about scoring points. We track your cumulative total across 50 matchdays. Prove you're the absolute best.
Live Standings
Completed Matchdays
Lego Bankruptcy Comeback 2003
It is early 2003. You are Jørgen Vig Knudstorp, the newly appointed CEO of The LEGO Group. The company is facing its first-ever deficit in its 70-year history. You are losing $1 million a day. The situation is catastrophic. Over the last decade, LEGO has tried to "innovate" its way out of a decline by diversifying into everything imaginable. You now own theme parks (LEGOLAND), a clothing line, video games, an educational toys division, and even a TV show. Worse, your core product catalog has exploded to 13,000 unique brick parts. Your designers have been given absolute freedom, resulting in thousands of custom-molded parts that are only used in a single, low-volume set (like the disastrous Galidor line). The result? You are drowning in supply chain complexity. Production costs are staggering. Your core product—the classic brick system—is being neglected, and retailers like Walmart and Target are slashing your shelf space because your chaotic product lines aren't moving. You have exactly 6 months of cash left before the banks force a sale or bankruptcy. You must decide how to save the brick. Do you keep diversifying into digital play to escape the physical supply chain, or do you perform a "Radical Surgery" on your own portfolio? This is a Tier 1 Strategy Match. The survival of a cultural icon is in your hands.
Instagram Stories Clone 2016
It is mid-2016. You are Kevin Systrom, CEO and co-founder of Instagram. Instagram is a massive success with 500 million monthly active users, but beneath the surface, it has a growing existential problem: the "Highlight Reel" effect. Users are posting less frequently because they feel every photo must be picture-perfect. The grid has become a museum of curated moments, not a reflection of daily life. Engagement is still high, but content creation—the lifeblood of any social network—is slowing down. Meanwhile, Snapchat is exploding among teenagers. Snapchat's ephemeral "Stories" format removes the pressure of permanence. Because the content disappears after 24 hours, users are posting 10, 20 times a day. Engagement is through the roof, and the core demographic that dictates the future of social media is migrating rapidly. Your growth team is sounding the alarm. If you don't solve the pressure of the grid, Snapchat will capture the entire next generation of social media users. You need an ephemeral format, and you need it yesterday. Your design team has proposed two options: invent a completely new, uniquely "Instagram" way to share ephemeral content (complex, untested, but proud), or shamelessly clone Snapchat's Stories format down to the exact circle avatars and tap-to-advance mechanics. The tech press will crucify you if you clone it, but inventing a new format risks confusing your 500 million users. This is a Tier 1 League Match. The decisions are binary, the press is waiting, and the consequences are terminal.
Google Reader Sunset 2013
You are the VP of Product at Google in early 2013. The company is in the midst of "Spring Cleaning," a sweeping mandate from the CEO to focus resources on core bets like Android, YouTube, and the new social network, Google+. Every product that isn't moving the needle on these core strategic metrics is under intense scrutiny. In your portfolio is Google Reader. It is a wildly successful RSS aggregator beloved by power users, journalists, and the tech elite. It has a deeply loyal daily active user base of millions, but user growth flatlined years ago. More importantly, it sits on legacy infrastructure that requires a complex, multi-quarter backend migration to stay operational and secure. The 3 engineers currently maintaining it are bogged down in technical debt and are begging to be moved to higher-impact projects. The executive team wants Reader gone. They argue that RSS is a dying, archaic protocol, that real-time platforms like Twitter and Google+ are the future of news consumption, and that the engineering maintenance cost is entirely unjustifiable for a non-core product. You have to make the final call on how—or if—to execute the sunset of a product that power users consider the cornerstone of the open internet.
Google Plus Real Names 2011
It's July 2011. Google has just launched Google+, attempting to challenge Facebook. Early traction is phenomenal. Millions of users are signing up. However, a major crisis is brewing. The platform enforces a draconian "Real Names" policy. The executive goal is clear: Google wants to unify user identity to build a unified data profile that can beat Facebook's ad targeting. The backlash is fierce. Pseudonymous users are being abruptly mass-suspended without warning. The tech press is dubbing it the "Nymwars."
Geo Aeo Strategy 2026
You are the head of marketing at a B2B SaaS company. Organic search drives 40% of your pipeline. In Q2 2026, two of your top 10 keywords dropped from page 1 of Google to "AI Overview included" — Google now answers the query directly with an LLM-generated summary, and your traffic on those keywords is down 35%. Your CEO is asking what's happening. Meanwhile, you've noticed ~8% of inbound demos in the last two months mention they "found us through ChatGPT" or "Claude recommended you." That signal is real but small. Your team wants to know how to think about this shift.
Foursquare Swarm Split 2014
It's early 2014. You are a PM at Foursquare, one of the most beloved mobile apps in the world. You have built an incredible check-in network driven by a strong social graph and addictive gamification (competing for Mayorships, unlocking badges). But you have a strategic dilemma. The data shows your user base is split. Half your users open the app purely as a social radar ("where are my friends right now?"). The other half use it as a local search engine ("what's the best pizza nearby?"), directly competing with Yelp and Google Maps. The app is getting bloated, trying to serve both masters. The UI is confusing. The leadership team is looking at Facebook's successful unbundling of Messenger and considering a radical move: splitting Foursquare into two separate apps. The plan: The main 'Foursquare' app will be entirely redesigned for local search and reviews, stripping out all check-ins. A brand new app called 'Swarm' will be launched exclusively for social check-ins and gamification. This is a Tier 1 League Match. The decisions are binary and the consequences are terminal.
Foundation Model Shipped Your Product 2026
You are the CEO of a $4M ARR AI startup. Your product is an AI sales assistant — drafts cold emails, summarizes calls, suggests follow- ups. ~200 customers, mostly SaaS sales teams. You raised a $12M Series A six months ago on the "AI-native sales agent" thesis. Yesterday OpenAI announced ChatGPT Agent — a built-in feature in ChatGPT (~700M weekly active users) that does roughly 80% of what your product does, available to every Pro user for free. The rollout is global. Your phone is ringing. Three customers have asked if they should cancel. Your board is convening an emergency call. Your sales VP wants to know what to tell her team.
Figma Browser Gamble 2015
It is 2015. You are the VP of Product at Figma. The design world is dominated by Adobe Photoshop and Sketch. Both are native desktop applications. They are fast, powerful, and industry-standard. Figma is a ghost. You've been in "Stealth" for three years. Dylan Field, your founder, has a radical and widely mocked vision: Professional design tools should run in the web browser. Every designer you talk to says the same thing: "Browsers are too slow for real design. I need a native app that doesn't lag." Your engineering team has spent years building a custom graphics engine in C++ and WebAssembly to prove them wrong. You are about to launch. If you ship a "lite" version, you'll be seen as a toy. If you ship a full-power tool, you might melt the user's laptop. You have to decide how to position Figma against the giants. This is a Tier 1 Strategy drill.
Facebook Mobile Bet 2012
It is May 2012. You are a Product Director at Facebook. The company is weeks away from its IPO, and the pressure is suffocating. For years, Mark Zuckerberg has bet on the "Open Web." Your mobile app is essentially an HTML5 wrapper—it's just your website stuffed into a phone app. It's slow, it crashes constantly, and users hate it. Meanwhile, Instagram and Twitter are growing purely on native mobile speed. The market is shifting. In 2012, more users are accessing Facebook via mobile than desktop for the first time. But you have zero mobile revenue. Investors are terrified that Facebook is a "Desktop Relic." Mark gives you a brutal mandate: "We are now a Mobile-First company. If you aren't building for mobile, you aren't working here." You have to decide how to rebuild the engine while the plane is flying at 900mph toward an IPO.
Dropbox Referral Engine 2008
It is late 2008. You are the Head of Growth at Dropbox. You have a product that people love, but your Cost Per Acquisition (CAC) is killing you. You are currently spending $300 on Google AdWords to acquire a single user who pays $99 a year. You have 200,000 users, but you are burning through your seed funding at an unsustainable rate. Drew Houston, your founder, has tried standard marketing, PR, and SEO. Nothing is scaling fast enough. You are about to run an experiment that will either save the company or burn your remaining runway on a gimmick. You need to turn your existing users into your sales team. But in 2008, "referral loops" are mostly seen as spam. If you get the incentive wrong, you'll look like a pyramid scheme. If you get it right, you'll build the most efficient growth engine in SaaS history.
Digg V4 Redesign 2010
It's August 2010. You are the product lead at Digg, the undisputed king of social news aggregation. Your platform defines internet culture, driving massive traffic, breaking news, and boasting a passionate community of millions. A front-page placement on Digg (the "Digg Effect") can literally crash a startup's servers. But underneath the surface, there's trouble. Growth has plateaued at around 30 million monthly users, and a new, uglier upstart called Reddit is slowly gaining traction among the tech elite. The executive team and board of directors believe Digg needs to go "mainstream" to justify its massive valuation and finally achieve profitability. They are pushing for "Digg v4", a ground-up rewrite that shifts power away from the democratic, user-driven voting system. The new vision relies on an auto-posting RSS feed that allows mainstream publishers (like CNN, Mashable, and Fox) to push content directly to the top of users' feeds. Furthermore, v4 plans to completely remove the "bury" button— the community's primary tool for moderating spam and bad content. The power users—the people who actually submit, curate, and moderate the content—are getting restless about the leaked rumors. The pressure from the CEO is on to launch next week to hit Q3 numbers, but the new version feels fundamentally antithetical to the Digg they love. This is a Tier 1 League Match. The decisions are binary and the consequences are terminal.
Cursor Vs Windsurf 2026
You are the founder of a YC-backed AI IDE startup. 9 months in, ~$400K ARR, 18 customers, a tight 6-person team. Cursor is the category leader (~$500M ARR, $9B valuation). Windsurf is the closest competitor with a different agentic angle. Your product is technically excellent — your prompt routing is arguably better than Cursor's. But Cursor has 20x your team and 100x your distribution. Your investors are asking pointed questions about positioning. Your next milestone is the Series A, which requires a clear narrative. The team is split: half want to compete directly with Cursor on general-purpose AI IDE; half want to pivot to a vertical.
Cred Design Launch 2018
You are the founder of a new fintech startup in India. Your product helps users manage credit card payments — pay all your cards on time through one app, with rewards on each payment. Credit card payment reminders aren't novel; HDFC Bank, ICICI, and Paytm all offer the feature. Your reward structure is interesting but copyable. India has ~80M credit card holders in 2018, but the active card-using population is much smaller — roughly 8M people who carry premium cards and spend significantly. These users are underserved: existing payment apps treat them the same as the broader population, with the same UX and same rewards. You've raised $30M from tier-one investors. The team wants to launch broadly. Your co-founder wants to launch invitation-only, gated to users with CIBIL credit scores above 750.
Clubhouse Fomo Scaling 2020
It is mid-2020. The world is in lockdown, and a new app called Clubhouse is the only place where people are "hanging out." It is a live audio social network, and it is currently the most exclusive club in Silicon Valley. You are a Product Lead at Clubhouse. Every venture capitalist, celebrity, and tech founder is on the app. The "FOMO" (Fear Of Missing Out) is at an all-time high. People are literally selling invites on eBay for $200. You have raised a Series A at a $100M valuation with barely a dozen employees. Your founder wants to keep the "vibe" intimate. He knows that live audio is fragile—if the rooms get too big or too noisy, the "magic" of eavesdropping on a billionaire's conversation disappears. But you have 10 million people on your Android waitlist screaming to get in, and Twitter has just announced "Twitter Spaces" to kill you. Facebook is also rumored to be cloning the audio features. You must decide how to handle the "Scaling Crisis." Do you stay exclusive and risk being overtaken by a giant, or do you open the floodgates and risk destroying the very culture that made you a unicorn?
Byjus Overexpansion 2021
You are the founder-CEO of India's largest education technology company. Two years into a global pandemic, your business is at peak momentum — schools are closed, parents are paying for online tutoring, your subscriber base has grown 5x in 24 months. You've raised over $1.5B in the last 18 months alone. Cash position is ~$2B. Valuation just touched $22B in the most recent round. Your investment bankers and your board are pushing aggressive acquisitions. Three deals are on the table simultaneously: - A US-based one-on-one tutoring service ($1B all-cash) - A US-based kids coding school ($600M cash + stock) - An Indian offline tutorial chain ($1B cash) Plus organic expansion into 6 new countries (UAE, UK, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia, Vietnam) is on the table. Plus salesforce expansion (~5,000 additional sales reps for the door-to-door vertical you've been growing in tier-2 India cities). Your CFO says you can technically do all of it.
Blackberry Touchscreen Delay 2008
It's early 2008. You are a senior PM at Research In Motion (RIM / BlackBerry), the undisputed king of the smartphone market. The iPhone launched last year. Initially, your co-CEOs dismissed it as a toy—it has terrible battery life, no secure enterprise email, and most glaringly, no physical keyboard. But the iPhone is starting to gain serious traction with consumers, and worse, executives are starting to bring their personal iPhones into the office and demanding IT support them. Verizon, your biggest carrier partner and distribution channel, is panicking. They want an "iPhone killer." They are demanding a full touchscreen device from RIM to compete with AT&T's exclusive lock on the iPhone. But your core enterprise users—and your executive board—firmly believe the physical keyboard is your untouchable moat. Typing on a flat screen is seen as an inferior, frustrating experience. You need to design the BlackBerry Storm to satisfy Verizon without alienating your core base. This is a Tier 1 League Match. The decisions are binary and the consequences are terminal for the company.
Apple Maps Launch 2012
It's mid-2012. You are Scott Forstall, Apple's powerful SVP of iOS Software. For years, Google Maps has been the default, pre-installed mapping application on the iPhone, functioning as a massive driver of consumer value. However, tensions with Google (who is dominating the broader smartphone market with Android) are at an all-time high. Google is weaponizing their maps data by withholding turn-by-turn navigation from the iOS version of Google Maps to keep it an Android exclusive. Steve Jobs had vowed to go to "thermonuclear war" against Android, and this is the front line. In response, Apple has decided to build its own mapping service from scratch, combining data from TomTom, OpenStreetMap, and several acquired startups. iOS 6 is weeks away from launch. Apple Maps looks beautiful with its vector-based graphics and new 3D Flyover feature. But internal testing shows major issues: mislabeled cities, distorted satellite imagery (bridges looking like melted Dali paintings), and dangerous routing errors that lead drivers into lakes. This is a Tier 1 League Match. The decisions are binary and the consequences are terminal for your career.
Apple Iphone Cannibalization 2005
It is late 2005. You are a Senior VP of Product at Apple, reporting directly to Steve Jobs. The iPod is a monster. It accounts for 45% of Apple's total revenue and 50% of its profit. You are essentially a hardware company that sells music players. But Steve is terrified. He sees a trend: cell phone makers (Nokia, Motorola, Sony Ericsson) are starting to put MP3 players inside their phones. Steve's logic is brutal: "The device that is always with you is the device that wins. If a phone can play music, no one will carry an iPod. We have to build a phone, or we are dead." But Apple has never built a phone. You don't have the radio technology, you don't have the relationship with carriers (Cingular, Verizon), and most importantly—building a phone will almost certainly kill the iPod business. You are being asked to destroy your most successful product to save the future of the company. This is a Tier 1 League Match. The decisions are binary and the consequences are terminal.
Amazon Prime Shipping Gamble 2005
It is late 2004. You are Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon. Amazon is growing steadily, but it's still fundamentally an online bookstore that also sells CDs, DVDs, and some electronics. Your biggest barrier to massive e-commerce adoption is shipping friction. Customers fill their carts, get to checkout, see a $6.99 shipping fee, and abandon the cart. The psychological pain of paying for shipping is capping your growth. One of your engineers, Charlie Ward, proposes a wild idea inspired by software subscriptions: an "all-you-can-eat" subscription program for fast, two-day shipping. Customers would pay $79 upfront for a year, and then every order, no matter how small, ships for free in two days. Your CFO, Tom Szkutak, runs the numbers and has a panic attack. Two-day shipping is incredibly expensive, requiring expedited air freight. The modeling shows that if you launch this, your heaviest buyers will exploit it immediately. Amazon will lose hundreds of millions of dollars on shipping costs in the first year alone. Wall Street already thinks Amazon is unprofitably aggressive and lacks discipline. This could crash the stock and lead to a shareholder revolt. This is a Tier 1 League Match. The decisions are binary and the consequences are terminal. You are betting the company on consumer psychology over spreadsheet math.
Amazon Fire Phone Flop 2014
Step into 2012-2013 as the VP of Product for Amazon's highly secretive phone project. Jeff Bezos is pushing hard for a "Dynamic Perspective" feature (a 3D UI using four custom cameras) to differentiate from Apple and Samsung. Engineering is screaming about battery drain, bill-of-materials (BOM) cost, and schedule delays. Your mission: Navigate hardware hubris, feature bloat, and pricing strategy. Can you build a device that serves Amazon's core ecosystem without burning a billion dollars in inventory write-downs? The choices you make will determine if you become a footnote in tech history or an ecosystem pioneer.
Ai Search Referral Collapse 2026
You're the founder of a 4-year-old B2B SaaS content site. ~$2M ARR. 90% of your pipeline traditionally came from Google organic search — long-form articles, comparison pages, glossary content. You have ~400 pages indexed, most of them ranking page-1 for high-intent queries. Over the last 6 months, Google AI Overviews + Perplexity + ChatGPT search have steadily eaten your top-of-funnel. Specific keyword rankings haven't moved much, but click-through rates have collapsed — AI engines answer directly without sending clicks. Organic pipeline is down 45% YoY. Paid conversion has held but CAC is rising. Your CFO wants a plan by Friday.
Ai Hiring Assessment 2026
You are the VP of Engineering at a growth-stage company. Hiring pace has accelerated — 30+ open engineering roles, ~500 applicants per role. Your recruiting team is overwhelmed, and senior engineers are spending 10+ hours/week in interview loops. A vendor has pitched you their AI hiring assessment platform: every applicant takes a 60-minute structured exercise (coding, system design, behavioral), the AI scores and ranks them, and your team only interviews the top 10%. Promised: 80% reduction in interview hours, "objective" candidate ranking. Your head of recruiting is enthusiastic. Your two most senior engineers are skeptical. You have to decide before the next hiring quarter starts.
Ai Agent Autonomy 2026
You are the lead PM on an AI agent product. Your agent reads the user's email, calendar, and CRM, and is designed to help busy founders manage their day. It already drafts reply emails (user reviews them before send) and books calendar holds (auto-confirmed if the slot is free). Engineering just shipped an internal demo of "Autonomous Mode" — the agent can now send the emails it drafts and confirm meetings without user review, with a 96% accuracy rate (4% of actions are later corrected by users). The CEO loves it. The founding designer is skeptical, arguing that the 4% edge case will ruin the user's reputation. You have a launch decision to make in 7 days for the v3.0 release. The broader market is shifting toward full autonomy, and investors are asking if you have an "Agentic AI" strategy. But your core user base relies on your product specifically because it never makes an unforced error.