Product5 minGroww · 2017
Groww logo — Product product case study

How Groww Took on Zerodha by Being Slightly Less Hardcore

Lalit Keshre and his Flipkart-veteran co-founders looked at Zerodha's massive market lead and built the opposite product. Mobile-first instead of desktop-first. Mutual funds instead of trading. Tutorials instead of professional terminals. Five years later, Groww has more users than Zerodha.

Written by northstar editorial·Updated 18 May 2026
Impact13M+ active users (more than Zerodha by user count). $3B valuation. IPO prep in 2025-26. Largest Indian broker by user count, though Zerodha leads by trading volume.

When Lalit Keshre and three other Flipkart veterans started Groww in 2017, Indian retail investing was effectively a Zerodha monopoly with a long tail of older banks (ICICIdirect, HDFC Securities, Sharekhan) servicing wealthier investors with high-fee, low-UX products. Zerodha had spent seven years building the dominant discount broker, attracting India's serious traders with its powerful Kite platform, ₹20 brokerage, and Varsity educational content. Anyone wanting to compete with Zerodha had to either match its frugality (impossible without giving up VC funding) or find a fundamentally different audience. The Groww founders, all former Flipkart product managers, looked at the Zerodha user base and noticed something: it was overwhelmingly male, urban, technically proficient, and trading-focused. The 90% of Indians who didn't fit that profile — first-time investors, mutual fund buyers, women, Tier 2-3 city users — had no good product. Groww would build for them.

The structural problem was that Indian retail investing had two missing pieces. First, mutual funds, which were the safer entry point for new investors, were sold through old-fashioned distributor networks with high commissions and bad UX. Apps like ETMoney and Paytm Money existed but were peripheral products of larger super-apps. Second, the equity trading apps that did exist (Zerodha Kite, Upstox Pro) were built for active traders, not first-time investors who needed hand-holding. The result was that new investors either bought mutual funds through clunky bank interfaces or paid high commissions to traditional brokers — or didn't invest at all. Groww identified that the next 100 million Indian investors would not look like Zerodha's first 1 million; they would need a product that assumed nothing about prior knowledge.

The key Groww decision was to lead with mutual funds, not stock trading. While Zerodha's identity was 'cheapest brokerage in India', Groww's identity was 'easiest way to start investing in India'. The first product was a direct mutual funds platform — zero commission, beautifully designed, with educational content that explained what a mutual fund actually was. Stock trading was added later, almost as a secondary feature, two years after the company launched. This sequencing was strategically counterintuitive: the trading business is more lucrative per user, and most fintechs would have led with it. Groww's reasoning was that mutual funds were the discovery wedge — a user who started with a SIP would graduate to stocks over time, but the trust had to be built first with a low-stakes product.

Newsletter

Reading northstar? Get the next case study in your inbox.

One product deep dive every few days — Apple, Cred, Razorpay, Slack, Zerodha and more. Free.

Free forever. Unsubscribe anytime. No spam.

The execution was relentlessly mobile-first. Where Zerodha's Kite was desktop-optimized (with a mobile app added as a secondary), Groww's product was designed for the phone from the first pixel. The onboarding flow took 90 seconds — KYC, video verification, bank account linking, all on mobile. The home screen showed a portfolio dashboard that even a first-time user could understand. Stock pages had explainer videos, simple charts (not the candlestick complexity that overwhelms beginners), and clear buy/sell flows. The educational content was bite-sized and contextual — when a user looked at a stock, Groww would explain key terms (P/E ratio, market cap) inline rather than burying them in a help center. By 2020, Groww had over 1 million active users; by 2022, that crossed 10 million.

The big strategic question Groww faced in 2022-23 was how to compete with Zerodha as the user base started overlapping. Zerodha had a 10-year head start on serious traders; Groww was acquiring users faster but they were lower-revenue per user. The decision was to stay in lane: Groww would not try to win Zerodha's hardcore trading audience, would not build a complex F&O terminal, would not chase the high-margin trading volumes. Instead, it would deepen its mutual fund moat (becoming the largest direct mutual fund platform in India by 2023), expand into US stocks (a feature Zerodha lacked), add personal loans and credit, and build wealth-management features for the long term. The thesis was that the next decade of Indian retail investing growth would be in long-term wealth-building, not active trading, and the platform that owned that user would win.

By 2024-25, Groww had crossed 10 million active users and was approaching parity with Zerodha by user count (though still well behind by trading volume). The company raised at a valuation around $3 billion and began IPO prep. Its profitability was thinner than Zerodha's (because Groww still had VC pressure for growth and lower per-user revenue) but the business was healthy and growing. The 2024 SEBI restrictions on F&O retail trading that hurt Zerodha actually helped Groww — the regulatory shift accelerated users moving from active trading to long-term mutual fund investing, which was Groww's strongest product. By 2026, Groww was positioned as the default investment app for first-time Indian investors and the IPO was expected to be one of the most-anticipated fintech listings of the year.

For product managers, Groww's case offers several non-obvious lessons. First, in markets with dominant incumbents, you can win by serving the audience the incumbent doesn't want or doesn't know how to serve. Groww didn't try to out-Zerodha Zerodha — it built for first-time investors that Zerodha never optimized for. Second, sequencing matters more than feature breadth. Groww led with mutual funds and added stocks later; the reverse order would have failed because trading is a higher-trust, higher-risk product than mutual funds. Third, design as a competitive moat works in fintech specifically because most fintechs treat design as decoration. Groww's UX was a measurable acquisition advantage. Fourth, staying in lane is a discipline most companies lack. Groww could have chased Zerodha's trading volume, built F&O tools, and tried to become a one-stop platform. By refusing to do that, it built a more defensible position in its actual audience. Fifth, regulatory changes that hurt incumbents can be tailwinds for challengers — Groww's growth accelerated after SEBI's F&O restrictions because their user base wasn't built on derivatives revenue.

Tagsfintechmobile-firstchallenger

Frequently asked

4 questions

Groww and Zerodha serve different audiences. Zerodha is optimized for serious traders with its powerful Kite platform; Groww is built for first-time investors with mobile-first design and mutual-fund-first sequencing. Groww has more total users (13M+); Zerodha leads by trading volume.